|
|||||||
|
Join DiaperSwappers and start buying, selling, and trading cloth diapers. Talk with other moms about parenting. Registration is fast and free. Join Now!
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered Users
|
Re: Spin off: Labor starting on it's own....isn't it impossible
My now 19 year old brother was born via induction at 43 weeks, and my mom was definitely right on her dates due to the fact my dad was an OTR truck driver, gone for sometimes 2 mos at a time, so the dates they DTD were VERY spread out. I've heard the story a billion times.. they DTD & then didnt DTD again until a little over a month later which is when they conceived. After that time they didnt DTD again until SEVEN weeks later. Throughout pregnancy everything matched up w/ the date she knew she had conceived. So she definitely knew her dates.
Her EDD came & went.. she was refusing to be induced, 19 years ago the risks weren't that known. At 43 weeks she noticed his movement had greatly decreased so she went in to be checked and it became obvious he was in distress. No labor on her end, what so ever. When he was born he was only 8lbs 2ozs but compared to her previous children which ranged from 5lbs 9ozs (yes, term) and 6lbs 14ozs, he was "big." His skin was dry & cracked from his lanugo falling off in utero & the fluids drying him out. The placenta was calcified and according to her looked like rotten hamburger. She never experienced even a twinge of labor. You'd think the body would eventually do what its supposed to... but who knows for sure; and who knows if it would do it before baby was in grave danger, like in my mothers case.
__________________
I'm Julie. I'm a lucky wife to Micheal and a SUPER blessed mama of 5! Jordyn (12.21.04) Preston (4.10.06) Kyson (6.24.07) Gavin (12.18.08) and Londyn. (4.19.10)
Expecting Emersyn Jewel in March 2013! Last edited by mommajewels; 08-11-2010 at 05:29 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered Users
|
Re: Spin off: Labor starting on it's own....isn't it impossible
Quote:
If the miscarriage didn't start either, I guess you'd end up like the Russian lady.
__________________
Casey..... wife to Jason, mother to Aiden and Brandy and step mother to Kaela. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered Users
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 554
My Mood:
![]() |
Re: Spin off: Labor starting on it's own....isn't it impossible
Not expelling a fetus that should have been miscarried does happen - as that story about the calcified fetus demonstrates perfectly (how interesting is that from a scientific point of view!?!).
I am not sure if it is possible to never go into labor with a healthy baby. Perhaps, but it must be extremely rare. With modern medicine, I think we will never be able to find out for sure. Plenty of women go "overdue" and even get to 44 weeks. I gave birth at 42 weeks and a few days with my son, and I have very regular period. I also know a woman who went to 44 weeks and had a perfectly healthy baby, with no signs of placental abruption. He was covered in vernix, as was my son.
__________________
I'm Olivia, crunchy mom of two great kids, and I write about birth! |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered Users
|
Re: Spin off: Labor starting on it's own....isn't it impossible
I would think it's totally possible with the way hormones work in labor and how hormones can get totally out of whack, but I also think that it's more likely nowadays for hormones to be crazy thanks to the chemical and animal hormone laden lifestyles many people live. But hormonal imbalances that occur naturally are definitely not unheard of!!
__________________
* * * * Aimee, wife to Chris * * * * * * * * Mama to Cecilia Ivy, born April 6, 2010!* * * * Putting that Early Childhood Development degree to good use these days! , , , ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered Users
|
Re: Spin off: Labor starting on it's own....isn't it impossible
double post.
__________________
* * * * Aimee, wife to Chris * * * * * * * * Mama to Cecilia Ivy, born April 6, 2010!* * * * Putting that Early Childhood Development degree to good use these days! , , , ![]() Last edited by Fire In The Disco; 08-11-2010 at 08:01 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered Users
|
Re: Spin off: Labor starting on it's own....isn't it impossible
Quote:
I think that in the vast majority of cases, a woman's body will go into labor eventually (I'd say "all", but I know there will always be at least 1 exception), but there would be more full-term still-born births. Not all inductions are medically necessary. I was induced with both kids. DD's was not "necessary"; they just had a policy of inducing at 41 wks and I didn't know I could say "no". DS's was definitely necessary and I am thankful that they were able to induce (at several points, they would have preferred to c/s me, but I was opposed, so they did ALL they could to prevent that and were able to, which a nurse and the doc admitted to being surprised about).
__________________
S, mama to K (9/07) and e (7/09) and married to my best friend, E (2007) Our CDs have a new home. Baby Cousin has arrived! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered
|
Re: Spin off: Labor starting on it's own....isn't it impossible
I think it's possible to not go into labor at all, but I think the baby would die at some point. With my first the placenta started to calcify and I had very little fluid at 37 weeks and had to be induced because she was in distress. They had a really hard time inducing me (took forever and lots of meds).
__________________
Stacey ~ mama to 3 sweet girls and 1 little prince |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Registered Users
Formerly: jenny342 |
Re: Spin off: Labor starting on it's own....isn't it impossible
My DD was due on Feb 14th, I gave birth to her on March 19th when the Doc finally agreed to induce her. My body has never gone into labor on its own.. ALL of my 4 were induced because of that..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Registered Users
|
Re: Spin off: Labor starting on it's own....isn't it impossible
I had an early u/s with kate and was very sure of my dates - down to the date of conception. I was induced at 42w1day and was not effaced or dilated at all. I hadnt even started the labor process.
With Kara, I went to 41w 6 days before inducing with acupuncture, but I had not started labor at that point either.
__________________
Jen -momma to MaryKate born 12/13/07, Kara born 7/22/09, & Adalane "Laney" 2/9/11
![]() ![]() Search with SwagBucks & earn gift cards! ADORABLE WINTER HATS FSOT! |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered Users
Formerly: bren***this |
Re: Spin off: Labor starting on it's own....isn't it impossible
I was induced with DS at 42 weeks 5 days, had him at 42w6d. I actually went into preterm labor with him at 24 weeks and they managed to stop the labor, but I was still 1cm dilated & 10-20% effaced when I was sent home a few days later. About a week after that, I went into preterm labor again and after another few days in the hospital, I was sent home on meds to keep me from going into labor. Doc slowly began reducing dosage on the meds when I was 33.5 weeks and I was completely off of them by 36 weeks. And then....nothing happened. Not sure if the medication stayed in my system for longer than predicted or what, but when I went in for a NST at 42 weeks 5 days, he was having a lot of decreased movement and his heart rate was fluctuating a lot more than the doc was comfortable with. They never checked my fluid levels, but during the whole course of being induced, having my water broke, and pushing him out, it was discovered that there was practically no fluid at all.
__________________
Brenna, all around AP'ing, trying to be crunchier, stay at home mama to Ash, Bryn, and our little Rebel Journey, wife to Nate ![]() Come swag with me!! I've earned $75 in FREE Amazon gift cards just by searching
![]() Last edited by smashncakes; 08-11-2010 at 08:36 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|

















,
,
, 











Linear Mode

